A literary comparison of medea and lysistrata

Little of his Roman History survives, but missing portions are partly supplied from elsewhere and there are many excerpts. Enriched by anecdotes, gossip, and details of character and personal appearance, Lives of the Caesars by Suetonius born c. Besides much else, his work conveys the turmoil of his time, and the part he played in a period that saw the rise and fall of Julius Caesar in a tottering republic. Lucius wants the sensations of a bird, but by pharmaceutical accident becomes an ass.

A literary comparison of medea and lysistrata

A literary comparison of medea and lysistrata

Traditional folktales never were. There are some good guys. There are some bad guys.

A literary comparison of medea and lysistrata

The good guys win. The good guys are usually scrappy amateurs; the bad guys usually well-organized professionals with typical fascist precision.

The good guys usually demonstrate a respect for human life and the bonds of friendship; the bad guys betray their citizens and their underlings with equal abandon. They gain their good guy or bad guy status by either following the universal law, or breaking it.

Neither the Greeks nor Trojans are especially good nor villainous. The Trojans lose some points for kidnapping a woman, but the Greeks lose some points for killing and enslaving an entire city.

Rutadeltambor.com: Sitemap

Neither side is scrappier or more professional than the other. Neither seems to treat civilians better or demonstrate more loyalty. Nor was it on the mind of the authors of Mahabharata, the Norse sagas, Jack and the Beanstalk, et cetera.

The article concludes this is because of nationalism. Nation-states wanted their soldiers to imagine themselves as fighting on the side of good, against innately-evil cartoon-villain enemies.

This was so compelling a vision that it shaped culture from then on: A Global History of Concentration Campsabout the rise of the idea that people on opposite sides of conflicts have different moral qualities, she told me: In short, we are rehearsing the idea that moral qualities belong to categories of people rather than individuals.

What are we to think of this? Robin Hood started stealing from the rich to give to the poor as early as the edition of his tale.

Essentials

The Mayan Hero Twins? Are there any differences between the way ancients and moderns looked at this?

Maybe modern stories seem more likely to have two clear sides eg made up of multiple different people separated by moral character. Villains as opposed to monsters, or beings that are evil by their very nature seem more modern. So does the idea of heroes as necessarily scrappy, and villains as necessarily well-organized.

And just eyeballing it, modern stories seem to use this plot a lot more, and to have less deviation from the formula. The past stories seem much more conducive to blind nationalism than our own. The amorality of the warriors in the Iliad manifested as total loyalty: Hector fought for Troy not because Troy was in the right, but because he was a Trojan.

Achilles fought for Greece not because he believed in the Greek cause, but because that was his side and he was sticking to it. What more could a nationalist want? In contrast, the whole point of modern good-vs-evil is that you should choose sides based on principle rather than loyalty.

The article gets this exactly right in pointing out the literary motif of virtuous betrayal.The history of literature is the historical development of writings in prose or poetry that attempt to provide entertainment, enlightenment, or instruction to the reader/listener/observer, as well as the development of the literary techniques used in the communication of these pieces.

Not all writings constitute rutadeltambor.com recorded materials, such as compilations of data (e.g., a check. If you’re a reader and user of social media, you’ve likely tested your lifetime reading list against the BBC Book Quiz..

Or perhaps you've allowed your worth as a reader to be determined by the number of Pulitzer Prize winners you've made it through.. The National Endowment for the Arts’ Big Read, anyone?. The Books that Every Student of . Yes, the Manicheans who divided the world into all good and all evil, and who gave us our indispensible term “Manichean” to describe a juvenile belief in nuance-free black-and-white narratives about the world.

At the Argentinean Billionaire's Bidding, India Grey Child Development, Shyam Sunder Shrimali Hitori and Sudoku, Nikoli Insight to Success, William J.

Smith Pills and Potions ABC French Bk A history of Ancient Greece (Greeks) from the Dorians to Alexander including their cities, Philosophy, Government, Contributions, rise and decline.

The history of literature is the historical development of writings in prose or poetry that attempt to provide entertainment, enlightenment, or instruction to the reader/listener/observer, as well as the development of the literary techniques used in the communication of these pieces. Not all writings constitute rutadeltambor.com recorded .

Loeb Classical Library | Harvard University Press