Paramount 1994

CBS Corporation, in order to "toss overboard" any unnecessary company assets, sought to sell the parks during the season, planning to continue their operation until a buyer was found.

Paramount 1994

Receive free daily summaries of new opinions from the California Court of Appeal. Subscribe Annotate this Case [No. C, Patti Kitching, Judge. Opinion by Lillie, P. Romo and Tina L.

Paramount Pictures - Wikipedia

Kannarr for Plaintiff and Appellant. Feinberg and Kathy A. Finn for Defendants and Respondents. Paramount Unified School District District appeals from a judgment confirming an arbitration award directing that District pay its former probationary teacher Paramount 1994.

Factual and Procedural Background This is the second time this matter, arising out of District's "nonreelection" or termination of employment of Frelix, is before the Court of Appeal. On the first appeal, District successfully defended the trial court's order vacating that part of an arbitration award directing that District reinstate Frelix.

In an unpublished opinion, Division Three of our District upheld that part of the trial court's order vacating the arbitration award reinstating Frelix, a probationary teacher, for an additional probationary year, on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his powers under California law by [26 Cal.

Teachers Association of Paramount May 23, B [nonpub.

[35] VEASEY, Chief Justice.

We set out the facts underlying the dispute between the parties as noted in the opinion in Paramount I. Frelix was a probationary teacher, a certificated employee for District during school years and ; on March 9,pursuant to Education Code former sectionsubdivision bnow section Derogatory allegations and significant complaints have been extensively documented in this record Practically all of them remained undisclosed to [Frelix] at any time, let alone in a timely manner as required.

These are not trivia. Timely disclosures would have enabled her the chance to correct her conduct proximate with its occurrence, if indeed the charges were accurate, as well as to dispel any misimpressions or misstatements of fact. It would also have afforded her the opportunity to seek and receive remedial counseling relative to her attitude and performance if such appeared advisable to her and the Association.

The arbitrator's award directed District, inter alia, to reinstate Frelix in her second probationary year for the academic year and to purge her personnel file of all documents other than those that were disclosed and identified to her to be placed in her file.

District filed a petition to vacate the foregoing arbitration award, and Association and Frelix filed a cross-petition to confirm the award; District did not contest the finding that it violated the collective bargaining agreement, but argued that the arbitrator exceeded his authority by reinstating [26 Cal.

Paramount Parks - Wikipedia Receive free daily summaries of new California Court of Appeal opinions.
Paramount Pictures dates its existence from the founding date of the Famous Players Film Company. Hungarian-born founder Adolph Zukorwho had been an early investor in nickelodeonssaw that movies appealed mainly to working-class immigrants.
Paramount - Coursework - ellie2day The initial offer to Paramount by Redstone in September did not seem like a bad deal. The merger was a natural fit which would create synergies and a more robust programming entertainment company poised to pursue international businesses and explore technological innovations.
Paramount Pictures dates its existence from the founding date of the Famous Players Film Company. Hungarian-born founder Adolph Zukorwho had been an early investor in nickelodeonssaw that movies appealed mainly to working-class immigrants.

On Frelix and Association's appeal from that prior judgment, the Court of Appeal in Paramount I noted that the "employment of public school teachers is extensively regulated by the California Education Code" Paramount I, supra, B ; school districts may employ teachers in the status of probationary employees; districts must notify the probationary employee, on or before March 15 of the second consecutive school year, of the decision to reelect or not reelect the employee for the next succeeding school year; and probationary teachers "may be nonreelected without cause.

Fontana Unified School Dist. Board of Trustees, supra, Cal. Instead of attacking the substance of the District's actions, i. It is nevertheless clear that the arbitrator cannot countermand the District's determination to nonreelect Frelix, in spite of a finding of procedural violations.

Although the association in the Fontana case conceded that the arbitrator did not have the power of reinstatement, and the Association here makes no such concession, the remedy of 'instating' for a second probationary year both in form and substance conflicts with the District's notice of nonreelection.

On remand to the arbitrator, District argued that the arbitrator lacked the power to award monetary damages to Frelix because an award would be tantamount to "back pay" or "front pay," which are "merely alternatives to reinstatement," and are unavailable to Frelix because she was not unlawfully discharged; absent the contractual violations, District still had every right to nonreelect her.

After hearing on remand, the arbitrator issued a second opinion and award dated December 30, In a portion of the award summarizing the evidence on the "post-remand arbitral proceeding," the arbitrator stated that it was undisputed and admitted by the parties that Frelix unsuccessfully sought employment by the Los Angeles Unified School District for the school year; she remained unemployed until February ; in the fall ofthe principal of an elementary school in the Los Angeles Unified School District informed Frelix that her former principal at Paramount had given her a negative recommendation, and based on his comments, she was not employed by the Los Angeles Unified School District at that time.

In a portion titled "Analysis and Conclusions," the arbitrator stated: It would result in a cynical perversion of public policy were arbitrators or courts to enable school districts to negotiate and enter into such contractual undertakings, as the law requires them to do First, she had and was denied her right to confront and refute any charges against her that might impugn her conduct or competence as a teacher.

Second, she had and was denied her right to the rehabilitative opportunity to remedy whatever deficiencies might properly be assessable against her and communicated to her by her principal so that she might conform to the reasonable expectations of her supervisors.

Paramount 1994

It mocks logic and justice alike to conclude that the District should be able to circumvent the basic public policy undergirding the sanctity of contracts and insulate itself in the name of a narrow public policy favoring discretionary nonreelection of probationary teachers, thereby avoiding its otherwise obvious consequential liability for the calculated infliction of those harms upon Grievant.

Instead the Award here is of traditional contractual compensatory damages for the harm done to Grievant by the District's breach of its contractual obligations.

Conceptualizing about 'back pay' or 'front pay' misses the point. She was harmed, and seriously so, jeopardizing her career and livelihood as a teacher, when the District completely, indeed flagrantly, ignored those contractual requirements.

Paramount 1994

The District thereby wholly frustrated her opportunity to demonstrate her competence and wrongfully impugned her in the eyes of prospective employers. The salary she would have earned serves merely as an objective guide to what otherwise would be a subjective judgment of what might be a proper measure of the harm manifestly inflicted upon her by the District's contract breaches.Paramount Parks was an operator of theme parks and attractions, which annually attracted about 13 million patrons.

Viacom had assumed control of the company as part of its acquisition of Paramount Pictures in The company once owned and operated five theme parks in North America and managed Bonfante Gardens in Gilroy, rutadeltambor.com late until late , Paramount Parks .

Paramount Pictures - Wikipedia

Paramount Communications Inc. Question 1 Paramount is a takeover target because other firms see synergy value associated with combining Paramount’s assets and operations with their own. Specifically, Paramount has several assets that complement other media companies.

Paramount Pictures Corporation (also known simply as Paramount) is an American film studio based in Hollywood, California, that has been a subsidiary of the American media conglomerate Viacom since View or buy the Paramount High School yearbook in Paramount, California.

Browse old high school photos of friends, family, class pictures, even celebrities!Pages: Feb 15,  · February 15, , Page The New York Times Archives.

Viacom Inc. finally won the drawn-out bidding war for Paramount Communications Inc. . Paramount – What do you think of Redstone’s tactics in making the initial offer to Paramount? The initial offer to Paramount by Redstone in September did not seem like a bad deal.

Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc. (Del. )